Comments with -5 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  0 thumbs!

  The_Don | May 02, 2008
  With all the complaints of the car handling, I don't think many will beat the four minutes and eighteen second mark. Plus, you'd have to get a pretty good sense of where all the streets, buildings and intersections are so you won't be slamming into a building every couple of seconds and going straight through the windshield.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Silver Mirror | May 02, 2008
  So this in a car? Try it on foot I say
• 
  1 thumbs!

  Kazooieman | May 02, 2008
  Liberty City feels like it's the real New York!
  
  Free roam games always need to have a HUGE city and I think GTA IV has done it good! =D
• 
  0 thumbs!

  tallteen86 | May 03, 2008
  OK, so they said "Run" instead of "Drive". I am well aware that "Run" is a perfectly valid way of saying it, but considering you can actually RUN in the game, it is a bit confusing yes?
  
  Pretty good time. I bet actual running (on foot) would take a helluva lot longer....Probably in excess of a half hour >_>
• 
  0 thumbs!

  StarJet | May 03, 2008
  Why drive a car? Moar helic0pt3rz, pl0x! Surely, GTA IV has helicopters, right?
  
  

  quote

  Free roam games always need to have a HUGE city and I think GTA IV has done it good! =D

  San Andreas did it first. Don't forget that San Andreas is actually bigger than Liberty City of IV.
  • 
    -1 thumbs!

    Final Blade | May 03, 2008
    _{Yes but its only slightly bigger to LC.}
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    TheBradman1andOnly | May 03, 2008
    Yeah, but half the map is full of empty space like deserts and shit.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  joshuam | May 03, 2008
  still bigger than Liberty City tho
• 
  0 thumbs!

  tallteen86 | May 03, 2008
  I hope the next GTA (there WILL be one, yes?) adds some wilderness, rivers, maybe a desert like area.
  
  Basically a GTA IV level of quality on a San Andreas styled map....
  
  Bring back planes and such...
  
  I wonder how long it will be before someone actually tries to do a speed Run (actual running) through the GTA IV map?
• 
  0 thumbs!

  The_Don | May 03, 2008
  Oh my, imagine how big (as in GB) a GTA IV level of quality of San Andreas would be. GTA IV was 60 GB? SA would probably surpass 100.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Silver Mirror | May 04, 2008
  GTAIV was never 60GB, to fit on the 360 they had couldn't have made it any bigger than 9GB
• 
  0 thumbs!

  joshuam | May 04, 2008
  the ps3 version must be more GB cause the ps3's is mre than 10GB
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Final Blade | May 04, 2008
    _{not really it would make an advantage to the PS3 version. They both use the same amount of GB space.}
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Stainless | May 11, 2008
  It is a huge map I will actually try to run around the whole thing once, haha.