123

Legendary Review. Is opening pandora's box really worth it?

XboxOZ360 | November 17, 2008 | Reviews | PC Playstation 3 
dkpatriarch gives us his impression of Legendary, Sparks attempt at a game many thought would be brilliant. If you went by the videos and the screen shots, you would think it would have a decent gameplay mechanic.

But according to him, there's lots to be desired and woah-be-tied the man that opens Pandora's Box.
We’ve had alien invasions, attacks from monsters underground, zombie infestations, and world-domination plots all threaten to destroy modern civilization unless we save it. Games designed to stoke our hero complexes tend to fill us with warm fuzzy feelings of accomplishment and enjoyment.

Legendary brings a new and promising idea to this theme by mixing Greek mythology and Da Vinci Code-like secret societies. It all sounds great, but will it be like Spark’s other great idea game Turning Point: Fall Of Liberty and fail to live up to its initial concept? In short, will the game really be legendary?

Let’s start with the somewhat fresh idea. You are a thief for hire who stupidly fails to do his research on a job for a secret society called the “Black Order”, releasing evil mythological creatures into the world by opening the ancient Pandora’s Box. Oops.
15 comments | go to source (xboxoz360gamer.com) | Add to favorites! favourite this article | send to friend | add alt source
Images about this story:
legendary_review_is_opening_pandoras_box_really_worth_it legendary_review_is_opening_pandoras_box_really_worth_it
Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 1 thumbs!
    Rate it up!
    Lord_80 | November 17, 2008 | reply
    Wow, I always knew of this game but it never really caught my attention. After reading this review I can see that I wasn't wrong in paying no attention to it.
  • 1 thumbs!
    Rate it up!
    Newcloud | November 17, 2008 | reply
    meh... i was never to interested in this game you could tell it was going to be bad by watch clips of the game. thats a shame it was a good idea
    • 1 thumbs!
      Rate it up!
      Immortal Kaim | November 17, 2008 | reply
      Agreed cloud, it was actually a good concept, yet just couldn't be pulled off...
  • 2 thumbs!
    Rate it up!
    HisServant77 | November 17, 2008 | reply
    I was interested in this game a lot at first. However, after some videos and seeing more interviews about it . . . it got scratched off my list.

    I mean, I love the idea of the mythological creatures and all that---except I personally like to see Gryphons as noble and not evil---but this just isn't the game that does the idea justice I think.
  • 1 thumbs!
    Rate it up!
    kspiess | November 17, 2008 | reply
    Uh, someone thought this game was going to be brilliant?

    I could've told you the game was probably going to suck a long,long,long time ago.

    For starters, instead of making anything original they just took all the monsters that they could find that did not have a copyright on them, and stuck them in the game.
    • 1 thumbs!
      Rate it up!
      XboxOZ360 | November 18, 2008 | reply
      Damn hard to copyright a mythical legend now isn't it. That would rule out a huge % of games based on myth then as being bad, which isn't always the case.

      The game had a good concept, but simply wasn't pulled off in the best manner. So was Along In The Dark.

      Excellent idea, artwork, design, etc they all just didn't merge in with each other to make a solid game. Not all developers have the HUGE resources many of the majors have now, nor the financial clout.

      So it's one of the reasons many smaller dev studios are moving to partnering with the bigger publishing houses such as EA, Ubisoft, Activision etc. That way they can still remain a stand alone studio, yet have the assets, engines and $$ to work with that they would not have if they remained by themselves.
  • 1 thumbs!
    Rate it up!
    Red 9 | November 18, 2008 | reply
    After IGN gave it a 2.5/10, I quickly avoided it.
    • 0 thumbs!
      Rate it up!
      Newcloud | November 18, 2008 | reply
      is that what ign gave it? thats horribly low!! il be avoiding this game like the pleag
      • 0 thumbs!
        Rate it up!
        HisServant77 | November 18, 2008 | reply
        "plague"

        I personally didn't care about the numbers. I went for the videos and interviews to decide based on the info myself.
    • 0 thumbs!
      Rate it up!
      Final Blade | November 18, 2008 | reply
      IGN isn't known for accuracy ratings. So with that, I'm going to play this game.
      • 1 thumbs!
        Rate it up!
        Ameer | November 18, 2008 | reply
        Yeah, when you're dealing with scores between the 7.5 to 10 area. Under 6 is almost always a pathetic game, and under 3 is unjustifiable. Reviewers aren't complete fools.
        • 0 thumbs!
          Rate it up!
          Final Blade | November 18, 2008
          I've played games that the scores with below 7 and it was a very good game. Also, don't believe everything a reviewers say.
        • 0 thumbs!
          Rate it up!
          Ameer | November 19, 2008
          Did I say I believe blindly what a reviewer tells me too? No; I was merely making a general observation which has held true with my own feelings on the subject of crap games.
        • 0 thumbs!
          Rate it up!
          Final Blade | November 19, 2008
          That was a general statement not just to you.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Rate it up!
    XboxOZ360 | November 18, 2008 | reply
    A score of 5 should mean "Average" . . . . and that's what the game is, just average. It will entertain some, but that's about all.

You must register and be logged in to post comments. Register | Login
Submit Newshelp
(0.1727/d/aeon)