Comments with -10 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  0 thumbs!

  Existenz | May 06, 2008
  Yay go Take Two, i guess when you have money you have confidence, Take Two would have never pulled this before GTA IV.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Final Blade | May 06, 2008
    <sub>Im sure they would have done this before, but felt they rather wait though.
    
    Well they had it coming.</sub>
    • 
      0 thumbs!

      Existenz | May 06, 2008
      They couldn't i mean they were a company without money all their money went to GTA IV thats why EA were so forceful they knew Take Two had no money.
      • 
        0 thumbs!

        Final Blade | May 06, 2008
        _{Trust me they had money, its impossible for developers like R* and T2 who makes massive money on great hit games to not have money. They lost money from making the game and Manhunt 2 but they had money, trust me}
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Bri | May 06, 2008
  While the game is violent and should not be given to kids, face the facts, Take Two had every right to put their ads there. I'm an opponent of censorship, period, and taking those ads down was a violation of free speech. I'm glad they're trying to set Chi-town straight.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  IAMJOB56 | May 06, 2008
  It isn't Free speech, really, it is the simple fact that today's society, for some weird reason, hates violent games, but adores movies that showcase, sex, drugs, and extreme violence.
• 
  2 thumbs!

  kspiess | May 06, 2008
  I'm glad they are going to sue. Taking down the ads was totally unjustified and a breach of contract.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  tallteen86 | May 06, 2008
  Though it is a bit 'after the fact'...
  
  Game has been out for a week now....
  
  Sure, ads woul still work and such, but meh...
  
  If they get some money back, it would probably be worth it...
  • 
    1 thumbs!

    Final Blade | May 06, 2008
    _{Its not about that, its about the Principal of the point that they breach contract. And they're going sue them cause of it. If you have a contract with someone you can't breach it other wise The magical words and action will take place}
• 
  0 thumbs!

  R1DDL3S | May 07, 2008
  Lol, but they should have kept them up there if it was under a binding contract. GTA IV signs being plastered everywhere you turn would get annoying htough
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Subtle Demise | May 07, 2008
  Lol, one of the few cases of a company suing somebody that I actually agree with. Breaching contract and essentially participating in censorship should be met with swift retribution and I applaud Take-Two in their decision.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Capn Droid | May 07, 2008
  Oh boy. A little child will see an ad, and because of it, become addicted to the game, or try it.
  
  Unlikely enough and against free speech enough for Take Two to deserve that $300,000.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Deathman48 | May 09, 2008
  Yeah, if things are written down in a contract, unless there's some kind of police intervention or reason, there's no real way you can break the terms of your contract and expect to get away with it. If they wanted to advertise GTA IV then they should have already been more than aware that certain groups would oppose any promotion of the game. It's no reason to go back on a contract you signed.