Comments with -5 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  4 thumbs!

  slumpy monkey | April 28, 2008
  VG247: Why choose to lead on the PS3?
  
  Mark Randell : Very simple reason: Ghostbusters is the property of Sony Pictures.
  
  
  Case
  closed
  • 
    -1 thumbs!

    Final Blade | April 28, 2008
    _{Wait if this is property of Sony pictures then why are they making a 360 version? Its essentially their game, which means instant exclusive. Now im not trying to cause any trouble but its plain as day from his response.}
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Seeker X | April 28, 2008
  Don't you mean "Ghostbusters held back on the 360"?
• 
  -1 thumbs!

  anatomyofme | April 28, 2008
  This is the funny part about consoles and there manufacturers, just like spider man and now with ghostbusters, Sony is still the winner in the end. lol Cause say it sells better on the 360 sony stil gets paid royalties for its property. lol So in the end when a movie property becomes a game like this its a win win for sony. This is just more evidence that there is no console war. Cause if there was niether would want to work with the other. No matter which console wins, this is prof that money is the answer not the war.
• 
  3 thumbs!

  Cdemon | April 28, 2008
  Hey guise, I got a great idea. Let's take property we own, make a game that nobody will care about based on it for our console, showcasing how kickass we think it is, and then let's totally port it over to a competitor's console and make it look like SHIT.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Seeker X | April 28, 2008
    This is probably the only time I'll ever agree. This is some bad PR bullshit and PS3 french-kissing if I've ever seen one. Sounds like something Peter Dille would say.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Final Blade | April 28, 2008
    _{To actually think thats what they're doing is sorta absurd.}
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Rusty Bucket Boy | April 29, 2008
  Congladurations!!!
  
  You have completed a great game.
  
  Now go rest our heroes!