Comments with -5 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  1 thumbs!

  Gogetenks | April 22, 2008
  I think this would be best for the franchise. Treyarch isn't a bad developer by any means, but I think Infinity Ward would be the better choice. After seeing the franchise reaching bold new heights with Call of Duty 4 (easily my favourite FPS to date, I just love it), it feels like a step back to play another WWII game by Treyarch.
  
  I'm not a big fan of having two developers taking turns with a franchise, really. It tends to make the weaker developer's shortcomings stand out more. I would be happy to hear this rumour confirmed sometime soon.
  • 
    1 thumbs!

    Storm | April 22, 2008
    Completely agree, Gogetenks. You can surely tell when a game series is made by a different developer simply by playing it. CoD3 just didn't have the style I was used to (that and the fact that it didn't make it to the PC). Infinity Ward goes all out with their original game series, CoD, and should stick with it...I mean, just look at the success of CoD4.
    
    The problem I see with this is ActiVision Blizzard's (is that who they teamed up with?) promise made earlier this year... to get a new CoD, Guitar Hero, and a few others on an annual basis.
    • 
      2 thumbs!

      TurMoiL911 | April 22, 2008
      I seriously hope that they don't deliver on that promise. I'd rather wait an extra year between releases for a great game than have them waste development time cranking out below-average sequels just to make a sale.
      • 
        1 thumbs!

        Storm | April 22, 2008
        Same here, Turmoil. IW worked on CoD4 for over a year, and it turned out great, better than great. If they were more timed on developing these games within a few months, it likely wouldn't live up to expectations.
      • 
        2 thumbs!

        Gogetenks | April 22, 2008
        Agreed. I doubt CoD4 would have been anywhere near as incredible as it was if it were developed in a few months. That would just lead to more repetition, like we've seen in games like Madden. I hope that they just release one when it's ready. Giving each game two years would be perfectly reasonable, assuming that they manage to do what CoD4 did for the franchise. The games are certainly profitable enough to allow that time.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Gogetenks | April 22, 2008
  EDIT: I'm not sure what happened, but I editted the first comment and it somehow posted a second one. Sorry.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  TurMoiL911 | April 22, 2008
  Personally, I hope this article is true. I really feel that COD3's single-player would inferior to COD2. The only good quality of COD3 was the multiplayer, and COD4's beats that by a mile.
• 
  -1 thumbs!

  Final Blade | April 22, 2008
  _{It better be, Treyarch sucks ballz, well in terms of Call of Duty they do.}
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Donnelly | April 22, 2008
    COD3 was not a bad game. Sure, it's not as good as 2 or 4 but its still worth a rent if nothing else.
    • 
      -1 thumbs!

      Final Blade | April 22, 2008
      _{Its not worth anything in my opinion. I thought CoD3 sucked. Especially how 4 turned out, its going to be a bombshell in the future, IW knows how to develop CoD games.}
      • 
        1 thumbs!

        Donnelly | April 22, 2008
        It's probably good that you thinked it sucked. You know, seeing as what you say is invariably wrong.
• 
  1 thumbs!

  Existenz | April 22, 2008
  Could this be too little too late i mean Treyarch are going to ruin the franchise after CoD4 lol...
• 
  1 thumbs!

  tidus04 | April 22, 2008
  Hopfully this is true as IW are the better generators of the COD franchise tbh. Lets just hope whilst 5 is being made they have already started on 6 ^^
• 
  -1 thumbs!

  Vito Raliffe | April 22, 2008
  Proven False