12 hours 48 mins ago
110
PS3 Firmware 2.5 details
107
The mystery of the 11 unannounced PS3 titles is solved!
19 hours 49 mins ago
107
10 Reasons why Sony's PS3 will Conquer Christmas
4 hours 4 mins ago
101
Saints Row 2 on PS3 - £16 from tesco.com
7 hours 17 mins ago
97
Dead Space Review 9.5/10 (GCHD)
22 hours 44 mins ago
85
IGN US LittleBigPlanet Review - "Media Molecule delivers an instant classic".
10 hours 34 mins ago
68
Call of Duty: World at War Beta Launches
8 hours 58 mins ago
65
We the Gamers... a Gamer's Bill of Rights
11 hours ago

Submit a Story
Register
Get Started
Webmaster Tools



Comments with -10 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.
I like the bulky one tbh. Looks more sleek.
I also forgot to mention that from the pic, it looks extremely fragile. Tbh, it doesn't intrigue me one bit.
Feature 1 : Angry gamers who bought the fat just days before the announcement.
lol you're funny.
Probably works better too.
I never had problems with the Smaller Slim PS2 version, but the bigger PS2's were always a problem for me.
And I kinda get the same feeling of the bigger version of the PS3's, but hopefully, I wont have to witness that again.
Sony isn't that stupid. The PS3 is selling just fine. It's slowly but surely overtaking the competition.
You don't release a slim version of your console when it's already doing okay. You release the slim version when sales start to plateau and then you make a ton of cash.
People, use your *bleep*ing heads. Real refutable source too, eletricpig.tv? Please people, see through the bullshit.
A slim PS3 sounds good, quite a large and heavy console (out of the three, at least). I won't need it, though.
For another, the concept (which does indeed look like a Wii plus the top curved cover of the PS3, tacked together) designers seem to have forgotten the USB jacks >_> Unless they are under the overhang (can't see it), in which case, that isn't a convenient location at all....
And Sereph, there is only a 40GB and 80GB available now. 60GB is about phased out, and the 20GB has been gone for some time >_>
BTW: To correct the article submitter, it would be CHEAPER to consumers (states so in the article), not more expensive >_>
EDIT: In case there is any confusion, when I said 'within a year or somthing', I meant 'within a year of the PS4's release', just to clarify....
But then there like
"Oh hey that slim ps3 looks pretty snazzy, I might actually pick one up"
You don't release a slim version of your console when it's already doing okay. You release the slim version when sales start to plateau and then you make a ton of cash."
Oh so im guessing your last statement was wrong then???
But then you go on to denie this?
LOL irony at its best
anyone have any info on anything at all whatsoever about that version?? havent heard anything since january.
And lets not forget the PS3 seems to be on top so far this year in sales, i say the PS3 is doing great and already turning profit.
That and the going to cost alot is should be fixed asap.
Which reminds me, the title should be labled as a rumor. Its not confirmed from Sony mouths, so until then its not going to happen Anytime soon.
Some people eh?
They just need to stop where they are and make one type of console.