Heavenly Sword patch 1.10: rumble support, and more?

Final Blade | December 23, 2007 | News | Playstation 3 Gaming Tech/Hardware

It seems that Heavenly Sword has Rumble support. But the size for this patch is 18mb, kinda big for a patch, anyway if you have a rumble controller try out this game with rumble. And there is more things within this patch that has yet to surface.

See if you can find anything within the game.

News Story attached to:

Heavenly Sword [PS3]

10 comments | go to source (www.neogaf.com) | Add to favorites!

favourite this article |

send to friend

63	Sword of the Stars: A Murder of Crows 1.6.6 patch (0) April 6, 2009
69	Mistwalker To Support Microsoft In 2009? (0) May 10, 2009
8	Sword of the Stars Ultimate Collection Available in Europe (0) July 3, 2009
21	Developers - Take a lesson from NinjaBee, add Avatar Support (0) June 30, 2009
39	Sword of the Stars Ultimate Collection Releases in June (2) May 28, 2009

Comments

0 thumbs!
Storm | December 23, 2007

What kind of source is this?
0 thumbs!
Final Blade | December 23, 2007

Makes me sad i don't have a Dualshock 3
0 thumbs!
Storm | December 23, 2007

Does anyone have a Dualshock 3 yet? Japan, perhaps?
0 thumbs!
Final Blade | December 23, 2007

All i know Is i found the article here
0 thumbs!
Storm | December 24, 2007

Then why didn't you link the article from that source? :S
- 0 thumbs!
  Final Blade | December 24, 2007
  
  Cause Its not the actual source. And gamegrep approvers want the actual source not one from another news site.
  - 0 thumbs!
    Xenctuary | December 24, 2007
    
    Actually linking to a news site which has a further source is perfectly fine. It drives visitors to the site and works well within GameGrep's philosophies. In this case it would have been much better to link to the news site and not the forum thread. It gives it context and provides a clear explanation.
    - 0 thumbs!
      Final Blade | December 25, 2007
      
      Actually no. Last time i link to that source Many approvers said change link to actual source, and i told them it was from a Forum they said Thats fine. So im following what i was told and how to post articles back in may. Krunal and a few others told me this.
    - 0 thumbs!
      Xenctuary | December 26, 2007
      
      It would have been the better option in this case and is generally an acceptable thing to do. Whomever rejected that article must have made a mistake.
0 thumbs!
Storm | December 24, 2007

But there's so much more info on that other site. The forum you linked to has no...proof or anything.