21 hours 37 mins ago
174
6 Year Old Drives To School Using His GTA Skills
129
1up's Top 5 Most Irritating RPG Protagonists
20 hours 39 mins ago
90
7 things a hardcore gamer should not admit... Volume 1
6 hours 47 mins ago
79
Sony may never have a Halo killer?
9 hours 12 mins ago
75
PETA Names Fable 2 as The Most Animal Friendly Video Game of 08
23 hours 26 mins ago
73
Things gamers don't actually care about ... Even though you're supposed to
15 hours 24 mins ago
67
Sexy Dragon Etched PS3
16 hours 48 mins ago
64
Volatile Games Secret Triple A Shooter for 360/PS3 in 2009
15 hours 8 mins ago

Submit a Story
Register
Get Started
Webmaster Tools



Also, I think you'll find that the PS3 is doing just as well, if not better, than the 360 did during its first 11 or so months, its only real advance being that it came out a year beforehand.
... Notice how its always the Ex-Developers that start mouthing off at consoles as well ...
*bleep*ing pathetic.
"code needed to make the PS3 work is most likely only useful to you on the PS3"
That's the idea, this is clearly coming from a developer who does a lot of multiplatform titles and just wants to cash in rather than create a really excellent game that is designed for a certain set of hardware.
No one can refute the fact that the exclusive titles are undoubtedly the best for a specific console. There are great multiplatform titles as well for sure, but it's a fact that exclusive titles benefit from a higher level of polish and focus on delivering a unique experience.
But back to topic. He's pretty much saying what people were saying before the 360 and PS3 released. PS3's kinda gonna be a bitch to program for. Why would this have changed now? This dude is probably just frustrated with problems that porting to PS3 presents.
Exclusives are a different story though. A lot of them have been lack-luster up til' now. Even ones that were supposed to be big hits like LAIR but I do believe MGS4 will change that. Drake's Fortune still has everything to prove though.
Actually some developers (like the ones that made GRAW2) are saying pretty much otherwise, how it's NOT difficult at all. And you'll really have to take their word for it, cuz GRAW2 is STILL an amazing piece of work, no matter what reviewers wanna nit pick with it (colors and all that bullshit is really all they can pick).
I guess if you're going to talk about accomplishments you would probably want to stick to games / companies not relying on engines that have been developed for mass licensing.
Honestly I'm a lil tired of it. PS3 fanboys will continue to defend the PS3 even though they may be wrong. 360 fanboys will do the exact samn damn thing. Anyone in the middle who has an unbiased opinion gets squashed cause it's not in league with the fanboys.
Anyway, I can see a lil bit of what this guy is trying to say, but I don't think it's gonna be too bad after the usual multi-platform companies get a grip on the PS3. Personally I'm still not a fan of the PS3 due to the bloody high price for getting a good deal.
Yes we all know its a little difficult to program on the PS3 but the people who actually work on the system claims that its not all that hard.
Maybe the concept of working and trying has been lost in the sauce for awhile.
Hell most if not all of the PS systems wasn't cake walk to make games and two out of 4 has won top in the "war", things take time to understand. Stop complaining. Man he's acting like a small child.