Comments with -5 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.

• 
  0 thumbs!

  Revenger of Wastelan | August 17, 2007
  There were trilogies that i really liked, like the DBZ Budokai trilogy, i still like it, its great, and every game is keeping on a difference between each other.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  TurMoiL911 | August 17, 2007
  Hmm ... that article seems to like picking at the Halo trilogy ...
  
  

  quote

  We see it with games like Halo and the upcoming Mass Effect.

  Mass Effect's going to be a trilogy ?
• 
  2 thumbs!

  Play ISDF | August 17, 2007
  I can't say this is a great article, I agree that there is some truth in bits of it, but the majority...lets just say the guy needs to get a life.
  
  Trilogies are very expensive:
  It's called waiting for the price to come down. Firstly a console is going to last years and your not going to get it for 3 games only. If you can't be bothered waiting, then save money beforehand. It's not like it requires a straight-jacket, a katana and a rabbit that fires rockets as a hobby to do.
  
  They take forever:
  Oh please, it's not that bad. Waiting is a part of life and if you have to get your ass online to recall what generally happened then simply don't buy the next game. If you can't remember what happened then you obviously weren't that interested. It's not like your attempting to remember how to do a handstand blindfolded while reciting all of Shakespear's work word for word.
  
  You might not see the end:
  Ok, this I can't argue too much with. Although I must say that if the game was good, one way or another you'll get your next two games usually.
  
  The games look bad as a whole:
  Oh please, get a bloody life. Technology evolves. And it doesn't ruin the experience unless your a bloody freak. Things have to change. Would you prefer we were still playing 6-bit games on todays consoles? OMG ITS MASTER CHIEF IN 6-BIT FORMAT!!!!!!!! Grow up...
  
  The ending might not be worth it:
  This I can't exactly argue against either. Though keep in mind if the games so far were good, the chances of it being an epic failure aren't too high.
• 
  -4 thumbs!

  Final Blade | August 17, 2007
  Two reasons why this person sucks:
  1. he is a loser
  2. He probably a stupid fantard.
  
  Trilogies are awesome Never been disappointed. This guys needs a life.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    TurMoiL911 | August 17, 2007
    finalblade98, you've never been disappointed by a trilogy ?
    
    Have you seen the Matrix by any chance ?
    • 
      -2 thumbs!

      Final Blade | August 17, 2007
      Oh yes i have played them, and watched them and i loved it. And anyone hates them its either:
      1. They don't get the movie. or can't played the game well(if there talking about games)
      2. Just hate them for no reason.
      • 
        0 thumbs!

        Ameer | August 17, 2007
        How could anyone 'get' the third movie? If anything, it just brought up more questions than answers.
      • 
        -3 thumbs!

        Final Blade | August 17, 2007
        Well Have you seen the animatrix, well it definitely tells you everything you need to know. I fully understand. I don't see how anyone can't understand it. Its not like it rocket science.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Duker Nuker | August 17, 2007
  There are some trilogies I hate and some trilogies I like
  
  If I hate them
  
  -They're boring, they're stupid, I don't like the looks
  -If I like them then they have a lot of action and a great story
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Final Blade | August 17, 2007
    Your first reasons on why you dislike them is kinda lame IMO. I can understand if the gameplay isn't up to snuff, but looks isn't a reason. Boring is the same, and being stupid is a personal opinion.
    So i don't see how there any valid reasons overall to be bad.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Riku31069 | August 17, 2007
    I definately agree.
    
    If I like them, they should have a good story. If I hate them, they probably had a bad storyline, bad graphics etc.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  black doom | August 17, 2007
  Brawl and Halo 3 will be the first trilogy's I have played form start to end. Most game I play are either from huge series or once offs.
  
  Are they saying one of hose masterpieces in the making could ever possibly, not be worth it.
• 
  -1 thumbs!

  dandy01 | August 17, 2007
  Usually the first game in a trilogy is the best. After the first, game designers think they have to out-do themselves, and go over the top. -_-
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Mario_1 | August 17, 2007
  So they think the Metroid Prime triology is bad too? Screw them then.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Gary15 | August 17, 2007
  Not really a great article, heavily baised and it insults some pretty solid franchises.
  • 
    0 thumbs!

    Final Blade | August 18, 2007
    I agree Gary, its complete nonsense.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Silver Mirror | August 17, 2007
  Usaully if a game gets turned into a trilogy its got to be at least decent.
  
  I think one of the worst things about trilogies is that if its really good you feel bad once you finish it because you know there won't be anymore
• 
  0 thumbs!

  JJBDude | August 18, 2007
  I personally find trilogies good. If I like the first film I am nearly bound to like the rest, same with video games really. I don't like knowing when you've finished the 1st or 2nd game or watching film that your never going to see the characters again doing something new, so it's always a shame for me to finish the 3rd but it's understandable.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  Capn Droid | August 20, 2007
  Hmm... I don't particularly agree with this article. For a short while, GTA was a trilogy, and it was awesome then. Halo is soon to be a trilogy, and it's also awesome.
• 
  0 thumbs!

  LZ Schneider | August 22, 2007
  I do not agree. Like finalblade said DBZ Budokai 3 was the best out the the three games... And that's 'bout the only game I know of that I've played with the number 3 in the title (I usually play no generic games. And most games with 3 in the title are movie games...)