191

There would be no X360 if not for Sony

StarJet | January 02, 2009 | News | Playstation 3 XBOX 360 
In 2001, Sony partnered with Toshiba and IBM to create the Cell processor. Sony, Toshiba and IBM spent $400 million to design this processor. In late 2002, Microsoft also needed a chip for their then unnamed new gaming console and contacted IBM about it. In 2003, IBM showed Microsoft the specs of the in-development Cell processor. Microsoft quickly took the chance and contracted with IBM to have a chip like that built for them.
The result is what we know now as the XBOX 360 (or the red ring of death :|).
For the system's ambitious third iteration, though, Sony wanted an entirely new processing architecture. Most computer processing chips are built on the foundations of the chips that are already in use. Designing a new chip from the ground up is a costly and time-intensive process. So in 2001 Sony partnered with Toshiba and IBM to create the so-called Cell processor -- a chip so powerful that it would redefine PC-scale power.

David Shippy, as it happens, was in charge of designing the brains of the Cell, the processing core. In "The Race for a New Game Machine," he and his co-worker Mickie Phipps tell the story of the whole effort to build the Cell. They also describe how the project went off the rails, ending up with IBM engineers creating the processing chips for two rival videogame consoles and, along the way, delivering to Sony Corp. one of its greatest business failures.

When the companies entered into their partnership in 2001, Sony, Toshiba and IBM committed themselves to spending $400 million over five years to design the Cell, not counting the millions of dollars it would take to build two production facilities for making the chip itself. IBM provided the bulk of the manpower, with the design team headquartered at its Austin, Texas, offices. Sony and Toshiba sent teams of engineers to Austin to live and work with their partners in an effort to have the Cell ready for the Playstation 3's target launch, Christmas 2005.

But a funny thing happened along the way: A new "partner" entered the picture. In late 2002, Microsoft approached IBM about making the chip for Microsoft's rival game console, the (as yet unnamed) Xbox 360. In 2003, IBM's Adam Bennett showed Microsoft specs for the still-in-development Cell core. Microsoft was interested and contracted with IBM for their own chip, to be built around the core that IBM was still building with Sony.

All three of the original partners had agreed that IBM would eventually sell the Cell to other clients. But it does not seem to have occurred to Sony that IBM would sell key parts of the Cell before it was complete and to Sony's primary videogame-console competitor. The result was that Sony's R&D money was spent creating a component for Microsoft to use against it.

News Story attached to:
25 comments | go to source (online.wsj.com) | Add to favorites! favourite this article | send to friend
Latest Comment
Most recently commented on by Final Blade on Jan 3, 2009
Register as a member to subscribe comments.
  • 4 thumbs!
    black doom | January 02, 2009
    There would be no Playstation if it weren't for Nintendo. In this industry we are our own worst enemy.
    • 2 thumbs!
      Koloth | January 02, 2009
      Absolutely. The creation of the Playstation is a perfect example of one of the biggest blunders in gaming history. Nintendo gave Sony everything they needed then when they realize that the contract was less than favorable screwed Sony over.

      I wonder what Nintendo learned from that mistake? They are certainly reluctant to partner with anyone, or let go of any of their proprietary tech. Although that doesn't seem to be a good thing.
      • 0 thumbs!
        dwg14390 | January 02, 2009
        I agree with Black doom and Koloth.

        Nintendo screwed over sony and lost its place during the n64 and GC era, and Sony accidentally helped the xbox get where it was today.

        Now it's microsofts turn to do something that'll have Apple heading in the game department lol.
      • 0 thumbs!
        TwilightPrince | January 03, 2009
        Nintendo didn't really screw Sony over. Sony wanted the rights to Mario, Zelda, DK, etc, which meant Sony could make games with these characters and profit from it. And there was no way Nintendo was going to allow that to happen.
        • 1 thumbs!
          Koloth | January 03, 2009
          Sony didn't want the rights, that's just the way the contract was written up during the creation of the SNES CD. And frankly The contract was written up much the same when they pulled it from Sony and took it to Phillips. Hence the worst version of Zelda in the history of video games being developed for the Phillips CD-I.

          However it wasn't the fact that they pulled the contract that screwed over Sony. It was the how and when that did it. Nintendo pulled the contract but didn't tell Sony. The first Sony heard of it was at an CES conference When they announced their (more favorable) partnership with Phillips. And this was after the majority of the work was already done on the project.

          Frankly I think the out look of how Nintendo conducts business would be very different if they had bothered to read the contract before signing it. Or failing that had the decency to tell Sony to their face rather than letting them find out via a conference.
  • 4 thumbs!
    Darknet | January 02, 2009
    There would be no 360 if it weren't for Sony. There'd be no PS if it weren't for Nintendo. And there'd be no Nintendo if it weren't for Atari. It all connects.
    • 0 thumbs!
      Capn Droid | January 02, 2009
      Nintendo had existed long before the era of video games, and was involved in different video game related projects before working with such companies as Atari.
      • 1 thumbs!
        Darknet | January 03, 2009
        But who introduced video games to the Western world?

        Yeah, be quiet.
  • 0 thumbs!
    PangTong_Blademaster | January 02, 2009
    However the N64 DC PS1 saga is nothing compared to whats on the line this time.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Kinetic | January 02, 2009
    There would be no playstation if it weren't for Nintendo either. Funny how these things work out.
  • 1 thumbs!
    DystopiaSticker | January 02, 2009
    LOL RROD LOL
  • 1 thumbs!
    Silent Storm | January 02, 2009
    As has been stated before, this article is useless.

    Chalk another one up to fanboyism.
    • 0 thumbs!
      tekmosis | January 02, 2009
      How is this article useless? Did you even read what the article is even about because I think you just read the title and the description here and made assumptions based on what others have said.

      The point of the article which is not mentioned in the description here at all is that this is about a new book out by two of the guys involved in creating the Cell processor. Read Seans article on Neo to get a better idea what this is really about. Also you can u read the free pages on Amazon.

      I've purchased my copy already, should be on my desk by early next week
      • 0 thumbs!
        Silent Storm | January 02, 2009
        Whoops, you're right. I concede.

        Still though, by Starjet's description alone, you can see why I thought that way...
        • 0 thumbs!
          tekmosis | January 02, 2009
          Yea, I get what you mean. The description here isn't very accurate to the actual article at hand The title is a bit misleading. I'm pretty sure there would still be a 360, just that it wouldn't have used the Cell.
      • 0 thumbs!
        StarJet | January 03, 2009
        No fair! chautemoc is a professional news writer, and I'm just a n00b. *pouts*
        Anyway, I have to admit I should have done a better job with the description, but it's been a long time since I posted an article here.
        I'm hoping to get better again.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Final Blade | January 02, 2009
    I thought this was obvious already?
    • 0 thumbs!
      Capn Droid | January 02, 2009
      How would it necessarily be obvious? I certainly didn't know it.
      • 0 thumbs!
        Final Blade | January 03, 2009
        I was more referring to Darknet posts. Obviously one company sparked another in the gaming world.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Onvacation | January 03, 2009
    The 360 Has a cell? I thought that was a PS3 only thing
    • 0 thumbs!
      Koloth | January 03, 2009
      No the 360 doesn't have a Cell. They have a proprietary chip which is based on some of the Cell research. The difference is the 360 chip has 3 dual threaded cores while the Cell has 8 single threaded cores. However they apparently use similar architecture.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Armed Rebel | January 03, 2009
    Sony Xbox 360™?sdassa
  • 0 thumbs!
    HawkMan | January 03, 2009
    they could've gone to intel.
  • 3 thumbs!
    BANDITO ATTACK | January 03, 2009
    there would be no war and famine if it wasn't for sony
  • 0 thumbs!
    Bandito | January 03, 2009
    He has a point, it is useless.

This news story is archived and is closed to comments now.

Submit Newshelp
(0.1677/d/aeon)