17 hours 27 mins ago
93
Orinda sues Sony for Patent Infringement, Wants Sony to stop selling games
63
PSP 3000 to support PS3 controller?
5 hours 33 mins ago
56
Square Enix to Acquire Tecmo?
23 hours 12 mins ago
53
News on Rock Band 2's DLC
20 hours 43 mins ago
51
Resident Evil 2 Remake Coming To Wii?
17 hours 12 mins ago
48
Fancy getting punched in the face for a PS3?
7 hours 54 mins ago
47
The Speed Gamers have Mother Marathon to get Earthbound and Mother on VC
23 hours 51 mins ago

Submit a Story
Register
Get Started
Webmaster Tools




Comments with -10 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.
I also do not see how :
Reason #4: Retroactive Trophy Support
makes trophies better than achievments?
The achievements have been with the Xbox 360 since launch. Sony should have had trophies from the start.
I also noticed that it is you who put the article on next gen gamers.
I mean, eventually, people will probably have to start playing 2 or 3 games just to go up one level.
I'd find that annoying, personally.
If they're going to add something like trophies, shouldn't they be effective on the gamer and the replayability of his/her games? I could be wrong, but I'm quite sure that that's the entire point of Trophies. Adding replayability.
Maybe they're there just to annoy you by popping up on the screen every time you do something cool in a game? I'm sure that's it.
Not all people will care about them, but many surely will.
It will suck for those who care to get several trophies from a couple games, and make very little progress on their "Trophy Level".
It's like trying to add more replayability to MGS4 by adding a trophy you get for killing 100,000,000 people in the single player campaign. It would be cool to get in the end, but it would take forever and you'd feel like you've accomplished nothing up until then.
It's discouraging, so to speak.
Is that not true?
Lol, there are people who rent games just to get achievement points. You don't think people will care about their Trophy Levels?
Yeah. Okay.
Also...
It's not like that at all. It would be like doing all achievements for a couple games, but not really getiing any credit for it until you completed more achievements on a third game.
Like, it would work like this in "360-Achievement" terms.
Say, you have 2000 achievement points, and you'll need 3000 more to get to 5000 points. You play through two games, get 2000 more points, yet your score still reads as you only having 2000 points. Then you have to play through another game, get 1000 more points, and THEN you'll finally get credit for all the points you got in between 2000 and 5000. Get what I'm saying?
I'm sure that would get annoying to atleast some people.
If it wouldn't annoy you, that's perfectly fine, I'm just trying to say that it'll possibly not be liked by some people for that reason. I'm allowed to think that the system has a flaw. I'm not trying to just say it's garbage, because it's definitely not, I'm just pointing out something that I think some people won't like.