23 hours 55 mins ago
112
Top 5 Upcoming Gaming Sites
57
Tired of no Wii games being released? MyReviewPoint has the answer: create your own!
11 hours 26 mins ago
51
GamersDailyNews: EA causes chaos in London with £20,000 fuel giveaway
13 hours 13 mins ago
49
Details emerge about the PS3 Bluetooth Headset
22 hours 49 mins ago
46
Square Enix Confused By Tecmo's Take-Over Refusal
23 hours 9 mins ago
46
WiiWare - My Aquarium review
22 hours 8 mins ago
44
Xbox 360 Pricedrop Starts Today!!
6 hours 54 mins ago
39
White Knight Story will NOT be released on December 11th
23 hours 24 mins ago

Submit a Story
Register
Get Started
Webmaster Tools



Comments with -10 or lower "thumbs" are removed from display.
That
Is
Lame
pretty *bleep*ing gay.
It's a pretty big thing for any reviewer to refuse to review one of the PS3's biggest games before it's release. They're forfeiting alot of sales of their mag to keep their morals - It's nice to see that some companies still have them, and aren't willing to bullshit their love for a game just for a bit of money.
Besides who cares or buys their magazine anyway?
It's only natural that reviewers want to list negatives as well as positives in their reviews. After all, that's what reviews are for. But judging by Konami's list of restrictions, there are alot of things that can't be spoken about, seemingly because they might put the game in a bad light. Just look at GamesRadar's review - They had to apologize for creating such a short review because they were forbidden from discussing so many things. It's ridiculous.